White House sued by historic preservation group over ballroom plans

December 12, 2025

The National Trust for Historic Preservation has filed a lawsuit against the White House to halt construction of President Trump's new ballroom, claiming the administration violated federal law by demolishing part of the historic East Wing without required reviews. The nonprofit organization, established by Congress in 1949, argues that the White House bypassed mandatory processes including environmental assessments, filing plans with the National Capital Planning Commission, and seeking Congressional authorization. The ballroom project, which Trump claims is funded by private donors, has expanded from accommodating 500 guests to 1,350 people since demolition began in October.

Who is affected

President Donald Trump and the White House administration
The National Trust for Historic Preservation (nonprofit organization filing the lawsuit)
The National Capital Planning Commission (regulatory body allegedly bypassed)
US Congress (whose authorization was allegedly not sought)
Private donors funding the project
Construction workers on site
The previous lead architect who was replaced after clashing with Trump officials

What action is being taken

The National Trust for Historic Preservation is suing the White House in federal court
Construction workers are actively driving piles, stockpiling materials, and operating heavy machinery on the White House grounds
A construction crane was recently erected on the property
Work on the ballroom is continuing audibly, including at night

Why it matters

This lawsuit represents a significant constitutional and legal challenge regarding presidential authority over federally-owned historic property. The case tests whether a president can unilaterally alter the White House, one of America's most iconic and historically significant buildings, without oversight from Congress or regulatory bodies. The outcome will establish important precedents about checks and balances on executive power, the preservation of national historic sites, and whether mandatory environmental and planning reviews apply to presidential construction projects. Beyond legal implications, the White House serves as a globally recognized symbol of American democracy, making any alterations to its structure a matter of national and international significance.

What's next

The federal court in Washington DC will consider the National Trust's request to halt construction
The White House must potentially comply with legally mandated review processes, including filing plans with the National Capital Planning Commission
A public comment period may be required if the court rules in favor of the National Trust
An environmental assessment of the project may need to be conducted

Read full article from source: BBC